Paul’s connections to mysticism are a subject of intrigue and speculation among scholars. One notable aspect of Paul’s life is his “three years in the desert,” which bears similarities to Josephus’ account of his three years of study with the Essenes. This parallel has led some to explore the potential influence of Essene teachings on Paul’s mystical experiences and beliefs.
Jewish mysticism, characterized by its exploration of mystical experiences, divine revelation, and esoteric knowledge, played a significant role in the religious landscape of Paul’s time. The concept of the Logos or Memra, a divine intermediary between God and creation, was a central component of Jewish mystical thought. It merged Jewish monotheism with Hellenistic philosophical ideas, particularly those influenced by Stoicism and Philo of Alexandria. These concepts likely had an impact on Paul’s theological framework.
One scholar who has argued this is John Dominic Crossan. Crossan is a professor of religious studies at DePaul University, and he has written extensively on the origins of Christianity. In his book The Birth of Christianity, Crossan argues that Paul was influenced by Jewish mysticism, and that this influence led to the development of early Christian Gnosticism. Crossan points to Paul’s description of his experience on the road to Damascus as evidence of his mystical experience. He also argues that Paul’s use of the term “Logos” to refer to Jesus Christ is evidence of his familiarity with Jewish mystical traditions.
Furthermore, Gnosticism, a diverse set of religious and philosophical movements that emerged during the Hellenistic period, shares several commonalities with Jewish mysticism. Both traditions sought spiritual enlightenment, emphasized the acquisition of secret knowledge (gnosis), and perceived the material world as flawed or illusory. The Essenes at Qumran, known for their ascetic lifestyle and esoteric teachings, also exhibited resemblances to Gnostic thought.
One of the most prominent scholars who has argued this is Elaine Pagels. In her book The Gnostic Gospels, Pagels argues that Paul was influenced by the Jewish mystical tradition of Merkabah mysticism, which involved visions of the divine chariot. She also argues that Paul’s 3 years in the desert were likely spent studying with a Jewish mystic, and that this experience led him to develop his own unique theological ideas. Morton Smith was a scholar of early Christianity who argued that Paul was influenced by the Essenes, a Jewish sect that lived in Qumran. Smith also argued that Paul’s use of the term “Son of Man” is derived from the Essene tradition.
Another scholar who has argued for the influence of Jewish mysticism on Paul is Michael Peppard. Peppard is a professor of New Testament studies at Fordham University, and he has written extensively on the theology of Paul. In his book The Son of God in the Fourth Gospel, Peppard argues that Paul was influenced by the Jewish mystical tradition of Merkabah mysticism. He points to Paul’s description of his experience of being “caught up to the third heaven” as evidence of his familiarity with Merkabah mysticism. Peppard also argues that Paul’s use of the term “Christ” to refer to Jesus Christ is evidence of his familiarity with Merkabah mysticism.
Another scholar who has argued for the influence of Jewish mysticism on Paul is John Gager. In his book Paul and Philo of Alexandria, Gager argues that Paul was influenced by the Jewish philosopher Philo, who developed a sophisticated theory of the Logos. Gager argues that Paul adopted Philo’s idea of the Logos, and that this led him to develop his own unique understanding of Jesus Christ. Michael Heiser is a scholar of the Hebrew Bible and a former pastor. He has written extensively on the possible influences of Jewish mysticism on Paul, and he has argued that these influences are more significant than many scholars have acknowledged.
Another scholar who has argued this is Michael Pearson. Pearson is a professor of religious studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He has written extensively on Gnosticism, and he has argued that Paul’s views on the nature of Christ were influenced by his knowledge of Gnosticism. Pearson has also argued that Paul’s views on the relationship between the Old Testament and the New Testament were influenced by his knowledge of Jewish mysticism.
When these various influences—Jewish mysticism, Hellenistic Jewish ideas, and potential Essene teachings—converged, they created fertile ground for the development of early Christian Gnosticism. The blending of mystical experiences, esoteric knowledge, and philosophical concepts from different traditions contributed to the formation of a distinct Gnostic interpretation of Christianity. John Dominic Crossan is a scholar of early Christianity who has argued that Paul was influenced by the Hellenistic mystery religions. Crossan argues that Paul’s concept of the “body of Christ” is derived from the mystery religions, and that this concept helped to shape his understanding of salvation.
These diverse influences, including Jewish mysticism, Hellenistic Jewish ideas, and potential Essene teachings, converged to create fertile ground for the development of early Christian Gnosticism. The amalgamation of mystical experiences, esoteric knowledge, and philosophical concepts from various traditions contributed to the formation of a distinct Gnostic interpretation of Christianity. For example, Paul’s use of the term “Son of Man” is likely derived from the Hellenistic Jewish tradition, and John Dominic Crossan also suggests that his concept of the “body of Christ” is also likely influenced by Hellenistic mystery religions.
The Pulling the Thread Podcast 
Leave a comment