Exploring Diverse Perspectives on who the Historical Jesus Within Judaism: Insights from James Tabor, Geza Vermes, and the Jesus Seminar

September 29, 2023

Exploring Diverse Perspectives on who the Historical Jesus Within Judaism: Insights from James Tabor, Geza Vermes, and the Jesus Seminar

“The Jesus Seminar’s view of Jesus is one of the most important contributions to Jesus scholarship in recent years.” – John Dominic Crossan

There are a number of reasons why the Historical Jesus scholarship and particularly the Jesus Seminar believes that the Gospels are not reliable sources of information about the historical Jesus. One reason is that the Gospels were written many years after Jesus’ death, and they were written by people who did not know Jesus personally. Another reason is that the Gospels are not biographies of Jesus. They are theological documents that were written to promote a particular view of Jesus.

“The gospels are not reliable sources of information about the historical Jesus. They are theological works that were written to promote a particular view of Jesus. As such, they are full of contradictions and inconsistencies.” – Bart Ehrman, “Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Should Care)”

In our exploration of the historical Jesus, we have encountered various perspectives and theories that shed light on this enigmatic figure within the context of Judaism. In addition to the Jesus Seminar, there are a number of other scholars who have studied the historical Jesus. One of these scholars is James Tabor. Tabor is a professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He is the author of a number of books on the historical Jesus, including The Jesus Dynasty: The Hidden History of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of Christianity.

“Tabor’s view of Jesus is credible, but it is not widely accepted by other scholars.” – Bart Ehrman

Tabor believes that Jesus was a real person, a Jewish man who lived in the first century CE and was crucified by the Romans. However, Tabor does not consider Jesus to be the Messiah or divine. Tabor believes that Jesus was a member of a Jewish apocalyptic sect that believed that the end of the world was coming soon. Tabor also speculates that Jesus was married and had children.

“The Gospels are not eyewitness accounts of Jesus’ life and ministry.” – E.P. Sanders

Tabor’s viewpoint finds support in the work of the Jesus Seminar, a group of scholars dedicated to the study of the historical Jesus. The Jesus Seminar challenges the reliability of the Gospels as accurate sources of information regarding Jesus’ life. They propose alternative theories about Jesus’ nature, such as his non-Messianic status and his lack of divinity. According to the Jesus Seminar, Jesus did not fulfill the messianic prophecies found in the Old Testament, and he was not an incarnate God.

“Jesus did not claim to be God.” – Marcus Borg

Additionally, Tabor explores the significance of the Toledot Yeshu, a Jewish polemical text from the Middle Ages. This text portrays Jesus as an illegitimate child born to a Roman soldier and a Jewish woman. Tabor argues that the Toledot Yeshu, despite its polemical nature, is rooted in historical facts. He believes that the story of Jesus being the son of a Roman soldier aligns with other evidence, including the crucifixion.

“Marcus Borg’s work on the historical Jesus is some of the most important and influential scholarship in the field. He has challenged traditional views of Jesus and offered a new way of understanding him.” – John P. Meier

It becomes evident that the historical Jesus within Judaism is a subject of diverse perspectives. Jesus, a Jewish man who lived in the first century CE, served as a teacher, gathering a group of disciples around him. Crucifixion by the Romans marked his fate, leading to divergent interpretations among his followers. While some recognized him as the Messiah, Judaism as a whole does not accept Jesus in this role. Jewish beliefs regarding Jesus range from considering him to be a false prophet to acknowledging him as a morally upright teacher without divinity.

“There is no single messianic prophecy in the Hebrew Bible that Jesus fulfilled in all its details.” – Geza Vermes

Christianity emerged from the Jewish movement that followed Jesus. By considering the insights provided by scholars like James Tabor, Geza Vermes and the Jesus Seminar, we are presented with ways of understanding the historical Jesus. These viewpoints challenge the conventional narrative of Jesus as the Messiah and the Son of God.

“The gospels are not intended to be biographies of Jesus, but rather theological works that were written to promote a particular view of Jesus. As such, they are not reliable sources of information about the historical Jesus.” – Burton L. Mack, “A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins”

The study of the historical Jesus within Judaism is a complex and ongoing field of research. It encompasses a range of viewpoints, including those that question the reliability of the Gospels, investigate alternative historical sources like the Talmud, Toledot Yeshu, and challenge traditional beliefs regarding Jesus’ Messianic and divine nature.

“The historical Jesus was a Jewish apocalyptic prophet who believed that he was the Messiah. He was not divine, but he was a unique and important figure in Jewish history.” John P. Meier, “A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus”

Here is a summary of what we have discussed about the historical Jesus within Judaism:

He was a Jewish man who lived in the first century CE.
He was a teacher who attracted a following of disciples.
He was crucified by the Romans.
Some Jews believe that he may have been a good man, but not Messiah.
Judaism does not recognize Jesus as the Messiah or as the Son of God.
Judaism does not believe that Jesus rose from the dead or ascended.
Some Jews believe that Jesus was a false prophet.
Some Jews believe that Jesus’ teachings might be relevant today.

“The Toledot Yeshu is a Jewish polemical text that was written in the Middle Ages. It portrays Jesus as an illegitimate child who was conceived by a Roman soldier and a Jewish woman. However, I believe that the Toledot Yeshu is based on historical fact. I argue that the author of the Toledot Yeshu would not have made up the story of Jesus being the son of a Roman soldier if it were not true. I also argue that the story of Jesus being the son of a Roman soldier is consistent with other evidence about Jesus, such as the fact that he was crucified by the Romans.” – James Tabor

The Jesus Seminar has developed a number of theories about what Jesus was really like. One theory is that Jesus was a charismatic teacher who preached about the Kingdom of God. Another theory is that Jesus was a social reformer who wanted to change the world for the better. Still another theory is that Jesus was a revolutionary who wanted to overthrow the Roman occupation of Palestine.

“The gospels are not biographies of Jesus in the modern sense. They are theological works that were written to promote a particular view of Jesus. As such, they must be read critically, and their claims cannot be taken at face value.” – Gerd Theissen & Annette Merz, “The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide”

The Jesus Seminar is a group of scholars who have been studying the historical Jesus for many years. They use a variety of methods, including historical-critical analysis, to study the Gospels and other sources to try to determine what Jesus was really like. The Jesus Seminar has concluded that the Gospels are not reliable sources of information about the historical Jesus, and they have developed a number of theories about what Jesus was really like. One of the theories that the Jesus Seminar has developed is that Jesus was not the Messiah. They believe that Jesus did not fulfill the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament. Another theory that the Jesus Seminar has developed is that Jesus was not divine. They believe that Jesus was not God incarnate.

“The historical Jesus was a Jewish prophet who preached a message of social justice and the coming of the kingdom of God. He was not the Messiah, and he was not divine.” – James D. Crossan, “The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant”

In the realm of scholarship regarding the historical Jesus, several points and perspectives emerge:

The Jesus Seminar contends that the Gospels are unreliable historical sources. They assert that Gospels are not reliable sources of information about the historical Jesus.
The Talmud and even Toledot Yeshu are considered valuable sources for understanding early Jewish perceptions of Jesus. They include a collection of Jewish stories about Jesus and provides insights into how Jesus was perceived by the Jewish community.
Similar to the views espoused by Toldot Yeshu, historical Jesus scholar James Tabor believes that Jesus was the human son of Pantera or Joseph, is very credible.
Many in the Jesus Seminar’s view that Jesus was not the Messiah and was not divine is just one perspective among many in the field of historical Jesus studies. It is a credible view that challenges traditional Christian beliefs.

“The Jesus Seminar is a group of scholars who have been studying the historical Jesus for many years. They have developed a number of theories about what Jesus was really like, but they do not believe that he was the Messiah or that he was divine.” – Craig A. Evans

The views of Geza Vermes, James Tabor and those of the Jesus Seminar are just a few of the important perspectives on the historical Jesus. They offer a different way of looking at Jesus, and they challenge the traditional view of Jesus as the Messiah and as the Son of God. Here are some facts about the historical Jesus:

The historical Jesus was a Jewish man who lived in the first century.
He was a teacher, and he preached about the Kingdom of God.
He was crucified by the Romans.
Christianity developed out of the Jewish movement.
Judaism does not accept Jesus as the Messiah.

Here we explored the historical Jesus within the context of Judaism and secular scholarship. We discussed various perspectives and theories related to Jesus, primarily focusing on the views of scholar James Tabor, Geza Vermes and the work of the Jesus Seminar. Tabor believes that Jesus was a real person, a Jewish man who lived in the first century CE and was crucified by the Romans, but he does not consider Jesus to be the Messiah or divine. The Jesus Seminar challenges the reliability of the Gospels as sources of information about Jesus and suggests alternative theories about him. These views offer alternative viewpoints on the historical Jesus. They emphasize the need for critical examination of the Gospels and challenge conventional Christian interpretations.offer alternative viewpoints on the historical Jesus. They emphasize the need for critical examination of the Gospels and challenge conventional Christian interpretations.

Uncategorized

Posted by:

That Kick Ass Dad

I’m “That Kick Ass Dad!” I’m a Single Dad, Martial Artist (JKD/Kali/Silat/JuJitsu Instructor) @CaliCombatSystems, Actor, Rapper @ Podcaster

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Podcast available on Spotify, Stitcher, Pandora, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music, Audible, TuneIn, iHeartRadio, Deezer, Radio Public, Cast Box, and many more…

About The Pulling the Thread Podcast

Pulling the Thread is a captivating podcast that delves into a plethora of thought-provoking topics. With its engaging episodes and insightful discussions, it offers a fresh perspective on various subjects, serving as a valuable source of inspiration and knowledge. Whether you’re a seasoned podcast enthusiast or a curious newcomer, Pulling the Thread guarantees to captivate your mind and keep you coming back for more. So, gear up and embark on an intellectual journey with this exceptional podcast!

The Pulling the Threads Podcast’s primary objective is to study and analyze Jesus within his Jewish context through the lens of Judaism before Christianity. Our primary objective is to study and analyze Jesus within his Jewish context, specifically from a pre-Christianity perspective. Seeking a Jewish Reclamation of Jesus, relying on Jewish and secular biblical scholars who specialize in Second Temple Judaism, the Qumran community, the Parting of Ways around 90 CE, the Historical Jesus, and Textual Criticism. Some notable scholars mentioned include Geza Vermes, Hyam Maccoby, Alan Segal, Carol Harris-Shapiro, Lawrence Kushner, Samuel Sandmel, Bart Ehrman, James Tabor, Robert Eisenman, Paula Frederiksen, and Hugh Schonfield.

The site aims to approach the New Testament using the historical-critical method and textual criticism within the realm of secular Jewish scholarship, reflecting the perspectives of mainstream Judaism today. Engaging in scholarly and polemical discussions, the group seeks to question and challenge established Christian doctrines. The main goal is to establish an independent Jewish understanding of Jesus, emphasizing his significance within a Jewish context and distancing him from centuries of Christian interpretations. Furthermore, the group aims to conduct a comprehensive historical examination of Jesus, employing textual criticism to counter Christianity’s claims regarding the New Testament. The focus is on understanding Jesus within Judaism based on the Torah and Talmud.

This is about Jewish and Secular Scholarship into the New Testament using the Historical Critical method and Textual Criticism within Jewish scholarship. For us Jews, the Tanakh and Talmud inform our view of scripture. In the modern age, as Jews, we struggle with texts with an academic approach. The site is pro-Tanakh and will explore history, archaeology, and textual criticism to comprehend the development of the Jesus movement before the parting of ways with Judaism. It aims to emphasize that Jesus and his followers were seen as Jewish and part of Judaism, and that the conversion of Gentiles to Judaism by the community of James and Peter continued, with some Jewish followers remaining distinctly Jewish for centuries. It is important to note that this is not a study of Jewish-Christians, but rather an examination of Jews who followed Jesus within Judaism before the emergence of Christianity. Anti-Judaism is not welcome in this group, which focuses on Jewish perspectives within an academic framework.

This is an attempt to work out the Jewish Reclamation of Jesus, trying to understand him within Judaism before Christianity existed. The group’s objective is to understand Jesus within Judaism before the influence of Christian perspectives during the historical Jesus movement. It seeks to reclaim Jesus within Judaism, separate from Christianity, Messianic, or Hebrew Roots movements. The study incorporates textual criticism, historical Jesus research, and Jewish scholarship into the New Testament to assert the following beliefs:

The New Testament lacks historical accuracy.
The New Testament is not divinely inspired.
The New Testament has not been divinely preserved.
The New Testament was written by individuals decades and even millennia after the events it portrays.
Original autographs of the New Testament do not exist.
Consequently, the New Testament is not the most reliable source for understanding the historical Jesus as a Jewish figure.
To ascertain historical accuracy, we rely on modern Jewish and secular scholarship and engage in historical reconstruction.
Through textual criticism, we strive to identify the potentially most authentic sayings of Jesus, following the Q hypothesis in relation to the synoptic gospels.
The New Testament bears the influence of Roman culture and language, making it a non-Jewish text with glimpses of Jewish source material.
Greco-Roman influences, including Hellenistic, Stoic, Gnostic, and paganistic elements (e.g., Zoroastrianism) and the Roman imperial cult, have shaped New Testament ideas of salvation and hell in a manner contrary to Jewish tradition, resulting in a narrative distinct from the Jewish religion.
Both Jewish and secular scholarship acknowledge approximately 500,000 textual errors among the 5,800 New Testament manuscripts. These variations include theological revisions that were added by later editors and were not believed by the original followers.
The seven most authentic epistles of Paul were written prior to the gospels, with the gospels reflecting the addition of Pauline theology.
Jesus might have been an actual person, with the only point of agreement among Jewish scholars being that he was baptized by John for the repentance of sins and was crucified.
Jewish scholars concur that Jesus was not born of a virgin, was not resurrected, is not a savior, may be considered a false prophet, and failed as the Messiah.
Judaism represents the religion of Jesus, while Christianity is a religion centered around Jesus.
The term “Jewish-Christian,” used to describe the early understanding of Jesus in Judaism, is a misnomer.

Understanding Jesus within Judaism can aid us in grappling with a culture in which Christianity has altered the Jewish message. Given the history of crusades, pogroms, the Holocaust, and inquisitions that have harmed the Jewish people, recognizing Jesus within a Jewish context becomes crucial.

The Catholic Church, in Nostra Aetate, ceased evangelizing Jews and acknowledged them as a covenant people within Judaism. In response, Jewish scholars released Dibre Emet, recognizing the place of Righteous Gentiles, including the offspring of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, in Olam HaBa (the world to come). While agreement may not be necessary, it is important to foster understanding and coexistence.

The Pulling the Thread Podcast