The Pulling the Thread Podcast

Allow me to preface my perspective by emphasizing my firm commitment to fostering peace among all individuals. My inclination is consistently towards peace rather than conflict, recognizing that religious fervor often contributes to unnecessary wars. Despite the nuanced nature of my views, it is essential to clarify that I am unequivocally pro-Israel, expressing profound love and support for the nation of Israel and the Jewish people.

Historical Context

To grasp the Israel-Hamas conflict fully, it’s vital to explore its historical backdrop. The Jewish ties to the Land of Israel trace back millennia. According to historical and biblical records, the Israelites, ancestors of the Jewish people, settled in Canaan (later known as Israel) around the second millennium BCE. The establishment of the Kingdom of Israel and the construction of the First Temple in Jerusalem, believed to have occurred around the 10th century BCE, are pivotal historical events.

The Hebrew Bible narrates the history of the Jewish people in the land of Israel, detailing events, figures, and the establishment of kingdoms. External sources like Assyrian and Babylonian records document interactions with the kingdoms of Israel and Judah. Archaeological excavations, particularly in sites like Jerusalem and Jericho, have uncovered artifacts and structures, affirming the ancient Jewish presence.

Discoveries such as inscriptions, coins, and pottery with Hebrew inscriptions further validate the existence of Jewish communities. Accounts by ancient writers like Flavius Josephus provide historical narratives. Despite periods of exile, there has been a continuous Jewish presence in the region, with Jewish communities residing for centuries.

Archaeological evidence, ancient texts, and artifacts contribute to the understanding of the continuous Jewish presence in the region over the millennia. Despite periods of exile and dispersion, the Jewish people have maintained a deep historical and cultural connection to the land of Israel throughout their history.

The Jewish population in the region that is now Israel has varied significantly over the centuries. In ancient times, the Kingdom of Israel and the later Kingdom of Judah were home to Jewish communities. However, after the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE and the subsequent dispersion of Jews, the Jewish population in the area declined.

During the centuries that followed, the population of Jews in the region fluctuated under various empires and ruling powers, including the Byzantine Empire, the Arab Caliphates, the Crusader States, and the Ottoman Empire. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, there was a notable increase in Jewish immigration to the area, particularly with the rise of the Zionist movement.

As far as the roots of the Israeli-Hamas conflict trace back to the aftermath of World War I, when the British Mandate for Palestine was established. In 1917, the Balfour Declaration endorsed the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in what at the time was termed, Palestine.

The significant turning point in the demographic landscape occurred in the mid-20th century laid the groundwork for the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. The turning point in the landscape of the Middle East occurred in the mid-20th century with the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948.

Jews have maintained a deep historical and cultural connection to the Land of Canaan (later Israel) for millennia. Despite periods of diaspora and foreign rule, Jewish communities have consistently inhabited the region, contributing to its cultural and linguistic landscape. The Hebrew language, rooted in the area, exemplifies this enduring connection. The aspiration to return to the Land of Israel remains a central theme in Jewish identity, underscoring their indigenous status to the region.

Post-World War 1 – Arab-Israeli Conflicts

The current Israeli-Hamas conflict, a protracted and multifaceted struggle, unfolds against the backdrop of a complex history marked by territorial disputes, conflicting narratives, and geopolitical intricacies. While acknowledging the gravity of the situation, we seek to shed light on aspects overlooked in some mainstream media outlets.

For example, the territories of the West Bank and Gaza were initially part of the British Mandate for Palestine post World War I yet know one is talking about this fact. The San Remo conference later delineated the boundaries, designating these areas as part of the Jewish homeland initiative returning Jews to their ancestral indigenous home.

However, during the 1948 war, Jordan occupied the West Bank, and Egypt took control of Gaza. These territories were part of the original British Mandate for the Jewish people, making the current occupiers Jordan and Egypt who have since abandoned these settlements to self governance. Unfortunately, the news often neglects the historical background, creating a narrative that doesn’t accurately represent the facts on the ground.

Upon declaring independence in 1948, Israel granted rights to non-Jewish residents within its borders, in accordance with the principles outlined by the British Mandate to do no harm to non-Jews. The assertions that Israel operates as an apartheid state or seeks genocide lack factual basis. It is crucial to advocate for Israel’s right to exist, recognizing its commitment to democratic values and the protection of Palestinian rights as well.

Israel stands as a vibrant democracy, promoting harmony among individuals of diverse ethnicities, religions, and backgrounds. The legal structure guarantees equal rights for all citizens, regardless of their ethnicity or religion. Arab citizens play an active role in political, social, and economic realms, participating in the Knesset (Israeli Parliament), holding governmental positions, and pursuing various professions. It’s crucial to recognize the complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, considering security challenges and historical context. Israel’s actions prioritize self-defense against terrorist threats rather than being motivated by racial or ethnic discrimination.

The intertwining of the geopolitical landscape with various ideologies, including conspiracy theories similar to QAnon, adds complexity to the discourse around the Israel-Hamas conflict. These theories, often tinged with anti-Semitism, contribute to the spread of misinformation. It is essential to distinguish between facts and unfounded claims, actively countering the dangerous narratives that arise from such ideologies.

Conspiracy theories surrounding the Israeli-Hamas conflict include claims that Israel orchestrated the conflict, allegations of exaggerated casualty figures, and suggestions that external actors manipulate the situation for their geopolitical interests. It’s important to note that these are unfounded claims and not supported by credible evidence. It’s essential to scrutinize and counter such narratives to maintain an informed and ethically grounded discourse. There have been breeches in security and planning for what Hamas did. There is no way Israel did this.

We Must Condemn Terrorism

Most Importantly, it is crucial to acknowledge Hamas as a terrorist group, and their actions are profoundly disturbing. The atrocities committed by Hamas, particularly in the context of the 10/7 attacks, can be likened to Israel’s 9/11. The parallels draw attention to the gravity of the situation, underscoring the need for decisive action.

Given their affiliations with ISIS, Hezbollah, their anti-American and anti-Israeli stance, and their alignment with Iranian interests, it is imperative that Hamas is not only condemned but also eradicated. Their Iranian backing poses a significant threat, and steps must be taken to ensure they are stripped of power and prevented from perpetrating further acts of terror.

On a broader geopolitical scale, my personal stance leans towards advocating for a two-state solution for Israel or a scenario where two distinct peoples coexist within a single state. However, it’s crucial to differentiate this perspective from Israel’s response to the acts of terror orchestrated by Hamas. The complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict necessitates a multifaceted approach that considers historical, cultural, and political dimensions.

In the centuries preceding the Balfour Declaration, Jewish communities often found refuge and safety within the realms of Muslim lands. Despite the imposition of a tax as a requirement for their freedom, Jews were generally granted the liberty to practice their religion in Islamic countries once this financial obligation was met.

This sharply differs from the historical actions of Christians, influenced by what author James Carroll termed “Constantine’s Sword.” The violence initiated with Constantine’s forceful “conversion” to conquer under the banner of the Chi Rho (☧), later reinterpreted as the “Cross,” set in motion a pattern marked by violence and antisemitism. This pattern of violence under the banner of the “cross” led to the Inquisitions, Crusades, and Pogroms orchestrated by Christians, shaping the cultural foundations of subsequent developments.

According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, during the Battle of Milvian Bridge, Constantine had a dream commanding him to use the Chi-Rho sign to conquer under the banner of. Discrepancies arise in accounts, with some saying that Constantine instructed his soldiers to paint the Chi-Rho on their shields, while other claims he ordered them to carry a battle standard featuring the same monogram. Constantine’s triumph in this battle solidified his position as the ruler of the Western Empire.

The book “Constantine’s Sword” by James Carroll explores the historical and complex relationship between Christianity and Judaism, particularly focusing on the role of the cross as a symbol of both faith and violence. Carroll delves into the long history of anti-Semitism within the Catholic Church, examining its roots and consequences. The book traces the evolution of Christian theology and its impact on Jewish-Christian relations, highlighting moments of conflict and cooperation.

This tumulous climate of violence and antisemtism over the centuries in Europe contributed significantly over time to the establishment of separate ghettos in regions like Poland and Germany. The ghettos, with their restrictive living conditions and social segregation, became a breeding ground for deep-seated prejudices and tensions. This historical trajectory further played a role in laying the groundwork for the rise of Nazi-ism, that rose out of World War 1 and 2.

While it is essential to acknowledge that these developments were not exclusively attributed to Christianity, the cultural milieu fostered by centuries of religious and socio-political events undeniably influenced the course of history. The echoes of this complex interplay between religious, cultural, and political factors reverberate throughout time, shaping the narratives and dynamics that continue to impact societies today.

Some Things Change, Others Stay The Same

After World War 1, following the San Remo conference, the Allied Powers delineated the boundaries of Ottoman territories like “Palestine,” “Syria,” and “Mesopotamia,” these areas were placed under various mandates. The boundaries of the three territories were determined by the Allied Powers after World War 1. Later, the West Bank was occupied by Jordan and Gaza by Egypt in 1948 during that war.

Hamas, emerged in the late 1980s. Founded on a platform blending Palestinian nationalism with Islamist principles, its charter calls for the destruction of Israel. This uncompromising stance contributes to the perpetuation of hostilities. Israel has a legitimate right to self-defense. The constant threat of rocket attacks from Gaza into Israeli territory has compelled Israel to take measures to protect its citizens.

Contrary to portrayals that often focus on the military aspects, it’s crucial to highlight Israel’s commitment to humanitarian aid. Despite the security challenges, Israel continues to facilitate the passage of essential goods into Gaza, demonstrating a commitment to alleviating the plight of civilians caught in the crossfire. Israel contends that it faces disproportionate criticism compared to other nations grappling with similar security challenges. The complexities of the conflict are oversimplified, contributing to a biased narrative.

My endorsement of a potential resolution is rooted in a genuine desire for lasting peace, acknowledging the intricate challenges that must be navigated to achieve such an outcome. Understanding the significance of culture, history, and context is paramount. In essence, this perspective takes a panoramic view, soaring high above, and looking backward to illuminate the present.

Modern Background and Context

The West Bank and Gaza were once a part of the Jewish land portion of the British Mandate for Palestine in 1918 at the end of the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) when it was defeated in World War 1. When the Ottoman Empire was broken up into various Mandates of what has become many of the Arab countries we know today.

The British Mandate that came out of the Balfour Declaration in 1918 envisioned a Jewish homeland in “Palestine” and an Arab one in “Trans-Jordan” under the British Mandate. However, during the 1948 war, Egypt occupied Gaza, and Jordan occupied the West Bank—originally intended for a Jewish homeland according to the Mandate for a Jewish homeland in their historic indigenous homeland.

In 1948 when Israel declared independence they established rights to non-Jews living in Israel. When Israel declared independence in 1948, it extended rights to non-Jewish residents. Prior to this the British Mandate explicitly safeguarded the rights of non-Jews within the territories designated for the Jewish people in “Palestine” and the Arabs in “Transjordan.” The British Mandate stated that you couldn’t do anything to infringe on the rights of non-Jews.

The annexation of the West Bank by Jordan in 1948 draws parallels to Russia’s annexation of areas in Ukraine. Gaza and the West Bank were an integral to the original British Mandate for the Jewish people. Wars ensued as Arab nations, including Jordan and Egypt, occupied parts of Jewish Palestine, which had become Israel upon its declaration of independence in 1948 with the establishment of the State of Israel. The East Bank is in the country of Jordan who annexed the West Bank in 1948, as Russia had done to Ukraine.

As the international community stands against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a similar stance should be taken to support Israel’s right to exist. Contrary to claims of apartheid and genocide, Israel upholds national integrity and protects the rights of Palestinians within its democratic state—a level of rights that would not exist if Israel were not in existence. Israel is not an apartheid state and is not seeking to commit genocide. We need to stand for national integrity. Palestinians have rights that are protected in the democratic State of Israel.

Despite the historical facts, some mainstream media news narratives often overlook these details. The real occupiers were Jordan and Egypt but they have since abandoned those areas to the Palestinians. But some of the news won’t tell you this because it doesn’t feed their narrative.

Some Key Points to Understand regarding the Background of the Conflict:

1. The end of Ottoman Empire lead to the British Mandate (1918):
   • The Ottoman Empire, which controlled the region, was defeated in World War I.
   • In 1918, the League of Nations awarded the British Mandate for Palestine, including the West Bank and Gaza, with the aim of establishing a national home for the Jewish people.
2. The San Remo Conference lead to the Division of Ottoman Territories:
   • The San Remo Conference (1920) was crucial in shaping the post-Ottoman Middle East.
   • It determined the allocation of territories, including Palestine, Syria, and Mesopotamia (Iraq), to various mandates under the supervision of the League of Nations.
   • The boundaries of these territories were decided by the Allied Powers.
3. The Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate (1918):
   • The Balfour Declaration (1917) was a statement by the British government expressing support for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine.
   • The British Mandate was intended to implement the principles of the Balfour Declaration.
4. The Occupation of West Bank and Gaza (1948):
   • In 1948, following the declaration of the State of Israel, neighboring Arab nations, including Jordan and Egypt, intervened in what became known as the Arab-Israeli War or War of Independence.
   • Jordan occupied the West Bank, and Egypt occupied Gaza during this conflict.
   • Jordan’s annexation of the West Bank in 1948 is similar to Russia’s attempts to annex parts of Ukraine.
5. The Intent to re-establish a Jewish Homeland:
   • The West Bank and Gaza were originally designated for a Jewish homeland under the British Mandate.
6. Israel Protects Rights for Non-Jews in Israel:
   • At the establishment of Israel in 1948, the rights for non-Jews were recognized and protected.
   • Israel protects individual rights and is a democratic country.
   • Palestinians have rights protected in the democratic state of Israel.

Understanding That as a Foundation, My Position on the War is as Follows:

First, The Balfour Declaration and the Separation Plan aimed at delineating the territories of Israel and Trans-Jordan. Originally, Trans Jordan was designated for the Arabs, while Israel was intended for the Jewish population. However, the implementation faced challenges, as some Palestinians chose not to vacate the area and Jordan and Egypt annexed Gaza and the West Bank and have since abandoned them. Over the span over a century since the Balfour Declaration, Trans-Jordan has undergone a transformation and is recognized simply now as Jordan.

In the aftermath, the Palestinians in the annexed regions of Gaza and the West Bank, regions were granted for their self-governance by Israel. This historical progression highlights the complexities and challenges in the geopolitical landscape, reflecting the intricate dynamics that have shaped the region over time.

Within Israel, individuals from diverse backgrounds, including Arabs, Muslims, and Christians, coexist within a democratic framework. The Law of Return facilitates the repatriation of Jews, underscoring Israel’s commitment to providing a homeland. Importantly, the democratic ethos extends beyond ethnicity or religion, encompassing all residents. The presence of free press and a dedication to human rights further emphasizes the inclusive nature of the Israeli society, fostering an environment where various communities contribute to the nation’s pluralistic fabric.

In my personal experiences, I’ve formed meaningful connections with Muslim and Palestinian friends who share a belief that historical relations between Jews and Muslims were more harmonious prior to the Balfour Declaration. We view ourselves as distant cousins, akin to brothers and sisters connected through our shared ancestry traced back to Avraham Avinu. From this perspective, it’s evident that Palestinians themselves are not the root cause of the complexities in the region. Instead, there’s a shared acknowledgment that Palestinians deserve the opportunity for their own independence, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and respecting each other’s narratives and aspirations.

Given the passage of over a century, marked by events such as the Six-Day War, multiple intifadas, and various Jihad movements, the notion of relocating Arabs back to Trans-Jordan or Egypt is no longer a viable solution. Historical experiences have shown that such a proposition would likely trigger conflict within Islamic nations. In light of these circumstances, the practical path forward appears to be a commitment to a two-state solution or a single nation shared by two peoples. While the ideal remains peace and coexistence, the inherent challenge lies in cohabiting with those who harbor hostile intentions, emphasizing the need for a pragmatic and realistic approach to foster stability.

The Hamas’ charter, advocates for the eradication of Israel. It’s the story of the rattle snake in the top of the hill who wants down he’ll promise not to because he’s freezing but once he convinces you to take him down yet once he warms he then bites. You can’t coexist with people who want to eradicate from the earth. Hamas charter is to wipe Israel of the map. We can’t allow them to keep doing that. In certain instances, employing force or a “sword” may be deemed necessary to establish peace and ensure the security of the threatened party.

Second, I am very concerned at the level of anti-Israel rhetoric occuring. The concern is over liberals on social media who are defending Hamas, which is support for terrorism. The anti-Israel rhetoric and activities of the group known as the Jewish Voice for Peace (JVFP). The “Jewish Voice for Peace” name is so deceptive they are a anti-Israel extremist group that co-opted some on the left, seeking to influence the Progressive agenda and has saught to influence the Black Lives Matters movement by tying the Palestinians to the struggle of People of Color.

The historical tensions between Jews and People of Color in America, have existed really since Louis Farrakhan’s influence with the Nation of Islam (NOI) that had lead to a rise of anti-Jew sentiment within the Black community. JVFP’s attempts to co-opt BLM has resulted in the vilification of Israel as oppressors and institutional racists, which they aren’t, has pushed some liberals to adopt extreme positions, including supporting the BDS movement against Israel. This shift has even led some liberal leaders in universities to align themselves with Hamas, despite Hamas being recognized as a terrorist organization with a stance that contradicts liberal progressive values, who would eradicate them if they could.

In the aftermath of the civil rights movement, Jews played a significant role in supporting leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Their actions were motivated by a profound empathy rooted in the recent memory of the Holocaust. During this period, many Jews actively participated in civil rights initiatives, marching alongside African Americans, contributing financial resources to the cause, and engaging in political advocacy for equal rights. The shared experiences of persecution and discrimination fostered a sense of solidarity, prompting Jews to actively support the struggle for racial justice and equality, thus leaving an indelible mark on the civil rights movement.

In the wake of significant events such as the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case, tensions surfaced between Jews and people of color in America, marking a shift in their relationship. Some People of Color began perceiving Jews as individuals who could pass as white, and could navigate societal barriers more easily. With the emergence of the Nation of Islam (NOI) under Louis Farrakhan who added fuel to the fire. Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic rhetoric preyed upon on existing fears and suspicions, causing a strained relationship between the Black and Jewish communities.

In the context of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, the historical tensions between Jews and People of Color have been further complicated by the influence of groups like the Jewish Voice for Peace (JVFP). The JVFP’s anti-Israel ideology has been accused of exploiting and exacerbating historical sentiments, contributing to a narrative that has turned some People of Color against Jews.

The complex Israeli-Palestinian conflict has become entangled with racial justice discussions, creating a divisive landscape where allegiances and perceptions are shaped by historical and religious tensions. This pattern of distrust and animosity, rooted in both historical and contemporary geopolitical issues, adds a layer of complexity to the relationship between Jews and People of Color within the broader context of social justice movements like BLM. It underscores the ongoing challenge of navigating intersecting identities and competing narratives in the pursuit of collective liberation and equality.

Ultimately, the influence of JVFP and its anti-Israel ideology has contributed to a concerning rise in antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiments, particularly among liberals and People of Color. JVFP takes an extreme position that undermines Israel’s legitimacy. The situation is boiling in a direction that is harmful to Israel and actual Jews. The anti-Israel agenda has turned liberals into fascists who want to eradicate Israel because the “globalist,” an imaginary Jewish cabal.

The term “globalists” is sometimes used in conspiracy theories to refer to an alleged secretive group or cabal that is believed to control world affairs and manipulate events for their benefit. This conspiracy theory often involves anti-Semitic elements, suggesting that Jews, particularly influential Jewish figures, are behind this supposed global control.

Some of the theories out of JVFP sound alot like Q Anon disinformation, unfortunately the same water that Q Anon talking about globalist (meaning Jews) falls in line with the NOI under Farrakhan and now BLM with its association with JVFP, they are big on Boycott Divestment and Sanctions of Israel. This fervor, that people saw at Waco has been pushed mainstream, don’t drink the coolaid. Q-anon mainstreamed a nationalistic fervor unhinged from facts.

While some argue that it’s understandable for oppressed people to resist state oppression, the current situation suggests a lack of nuanced understanding of the Middle East Conflict. Regrettably, there’s a concerning trend where certain groups, including a faction of self-identifying Jews known as the Jewish Voice for Peace, are co-opting the anti-Jewish sentiment. This group’s involvement appears to contribute to an environment that is not only critical of Israel but veers into anti-Semitic territory, adding complexity and controversy to the discourse.

The alarming trend on social media involves not just expressing solidarity with Palestinians, which is reasonable, but rather the concerning co-opting of Hamas. Supporting a terrorist group like Hamas goes beyond advocating for the rights of Palestinians and delves into the realm of deep-seated anti-Semitism. It’s crucial to distinguish between standing with the Palestinian people and endorsing a specific extremist organization. Hamas is an integral part of the broader Islamic Jihadist movement, and endorsing it raises serious ethical and security concerns. It’s essential to engage in nuanced discussions that differentiate between supporting the legitimate rights and concerns of Palestinians and endorsing groups with a history of violence and terrorism such as Hamas.

Thirdly, Sprinkle the salt of “Christian Zionist” who believe in the Battle of Armegeddon in their book of Revelation while be necessary to convert Jews, to their failed Messiah, when they teach that there will be an end time war between Israel and Islam (they mean Hamas, plus Palestine, plus Lebanon, plus Iran) needs to happen so their Yeshu character will come to convert the Jews during their Great End Times Battle, that their failed messiah, gets a do-over despite completely failing and being cut off.

Christian Nationalist support of Christian Zionism is concerning because their End Time Prophecies calls for a War with Islam to convert Jews before Yeshu returns. They support a strong response to Islamic countries to provoke a war between Islam and Israel/the West. This is why “revival” was reportedly rampant during the Iraqi war on based they were fighting Islam and moving in “prophetic” times. There were revival meetings on military bases during that time. This is why there are some Christian conservatives are also pro-war. The Crusader ethos was strong in some chaplain services in Iraq and Afghanistan revival meetings.

Part of the problem was all the manufactured prophecy talk about Trump, and prophecies about him being the last president, leading up to Jesus return! The group I mentioned before in a previous blog, some of the NAR members and various alt-right Christian Nationalist groups whom prophesied Trump would be president, they wanted him to be president. Partially, because he will continue to make decisions to provoke Islam. Like he did when he declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel. Jerusalem is the capital of Israel for Jews. Jews and Palestinians need to solve this with some kind of compromise together.

Certain individuals within the NAR movement, whom advocate for “Messianic Jewish” conversion initiatives, have suggested that a future conflict with Islam will result in Jews embracing Jesus. This sentiment has been articulated by certain proponents of Messianic Jewish missionary efforts. Despite the prevalence of a Kingdom Now ideology, resembling Preterism, in many NAR churches—where the Hebrew Bible’s view of Israel is applied to the Church akin to replacement theology—there are still believers who adhere to biblical prophecies concerning the End Times.

Furthermore, concerns arise regarding the impact of ideologies promoted by groups such as Christian Nationals and Christian Zionists. Who believe that an End Time Battle with Islam is necessary to convert Jews to their Yeshu. These groups include organizations like some adherents of the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) and American Civil Religion (ACR), of whom some adherents are Kingdom Now Preterists, as well.

Within the NAR, there are those who adhere to a Preterist view, reinterpreting the Hebrew Bible’s statements about Israel and applying them to the Church in a form of replacement theology. Similarly, within the Christian Nationalist movement, some hold the view of the Church replacing Israel. While direct connections may not be apparent to some, the alignment of ideologies presents a potential threat, particularly when fueled by conspiracy theories akin to Q-Anon.

Trump has become a symbolic leader for a faction of extremists who have established a platform empowering neo-Nazis, the white alt-right, and a group likened to the “American Taliban.” This coalition advocates for Christian Nationalism in politics, presenting a Christian equivalent to Sharia as a countermeasure to actual Sharia, which is an alarming development.

Certain conspiracy theories echo the sentiments of the unfounded claims which are very reminiscent of the Bohemian Grove conspiracy theories propagated by Alex Jones’ Prison Planet among others. Within certain circles, these ideas morph into a perception of a Satanic “cabal,” often unfairly targeting Jews. This narrative has fueled spiritual warfare of some intercessory prayer movements, with groups praying against what they perceive as demonic cabals of “globalists” influencing world affairs. Paradoxically, these individuals engage in fighting an imaginary enemy—an evil secret Jewish cabal—while simultaneously expressing a desire to evangelize Jews with the goal of bringing them to Jesus.

The comparison to the historical lie of deicide, where Jews were wrongly blamed for the death of Jesus, reflects a recurring theme of attributing exaggerated power and influence to the Jewish people. Much like the emperor with new clothes, the narrative suggests a facade—asserting power that Jews have never truly possessed. Paradoxically, individuals expressing love for Israel also engage in prayers for its demise, driven by the belief that such an event is a prerequisite for the return of their Messiah. This juxtaposition underscores the complexity and contradictions within certain ideologies, where professed sentiments for a nation are intertwined with eschatological beliefs that anticipate its downfall.

The approaching years, particularly 2025 and 2030, bring forth concerns as some individuals advocate for a violent end times agenda who believe prophecies regarding the anticipation of apocalyptic events and their desire to hasten them can be troubling. The concern lies in the potential actions of those who actively seek to bring about apocalyptic scenarios, as these efforts may lead to real-world consequences.

The concern surrounding Christian Zionism is amplified by its occasional alignment with a support for war. This ideology weaves together a complex tapestry of beliefs, including end-time prophecies, eschatological scenarios, doomsday predictions, and the anticipation of Jesus’ return. Some Christian Zionists subscribe to a narrative that envisions a specific sequence of events, where Islam is perceived as a threat to Israel, and an attack on Israel is seen as a precursor to the return of Jesus. This intertwining of religious beliefs with geopolitical dynamics raises concerns, especially when it involves advocacy for military actions. The complex web of ideologies within Christian Zionism can contribute to a polarized and potentially volatile approach to international relations, requiring careful consideration and scrutiny.

Adding to the complexity, some individuals hold views that designate the Church as the New Israel, challenging the legitimacy of the actual state of Israel by asserting that its population consists mainly of “European converts” who are not considered true Jews. This perspective adds another layer of contention and misinformation to the discourse. Such beliefs contribute to a distorted understanding of Israel’s historical and cultural identity, further complicating the already intricate dynamics surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It’s crucial to navigate these perspectives with sensitivity and critical analysis, acknowledging the diversity within religious and geopolitical ideologies while fostering open and respectful dialogue to address the complexities of the current situation.

Lastly, The problem I see now is the people with ISIS and Hamas flags in these rallies in the US and Canada attacking Jews carrying Israeli flags. Put all these factors together we are in a place when those abused by Hamas Islamic Terrorism, are made to be responsible for their own victimization and are gaslit and blamed for violence against them. It’s appauling to blame the victims of terrorism. We live in this disgusting place where alternative facts obscure the natural, historical and biological laws of nature and ethics. This gaslighting Jews for their own suffering is sick if you ask me. It’s like the 9/11 conspiracy theories.

It is important to look at the historical context, complexities, and challenges in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Hamas is a terrorist group and we must condemned their actions. We must face the impact of anti-Israel rhetoric and how it leads to a genocidal antisemitism. There are concerns about Christian Zionism and its influece on geopolitics. It is concerning, the rise of antisemitism and the anti-Israel sentiments. It is a disturbing trend to blame victims of violence for the violence perpetuated against them.

While the conflict’s complexities are undeniable, various perspectives envision a future where Israelis and Palestinians coexist peacefully. This involves a two-state solution negotiated through diplomatic means, ensuring security for Israel and the establishment of a viable Palestinian state.

Many express strong support for Israel’s right to self-defense, emphasizing the country’s security concerns and the constant threat of rocket attacks from Hamas. They advocate for Israel’s right to protect its citizens and maintain its existence in a region marked by historical and geopolitical complexities. Additionally, there are also voices that emphasize the importance of a just and peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Some advocate for diplomatic efforts, a two-state solution, and dialogue to achieve lasting peace in the region. They may criticize certain Israeli policies and actions while expressing concern for the well-being of both Israelis and Palestinians.

In navigating the Israeli-Hamas conflict, it is imperative to acknowledge the intricate historical, geopolitical, and ideological factors at play. We seek to add to a more nuanced understanding, emphasizing Israel’s right to self-defense, commitment to humanitarian efforts, and aspirations for a peaceful coexistence in the region. It is through open dialogue and a comprehensive grasp of the realities on the ground that a path towards lasting peace can be forged.

In conclusion, navigating the complexities of the Israel-Hamas conflict requires a nuanced understanding of history, geopolitics, and the influence of various ideologies. By promoting accurate information and countering misinformation, we can contribute to a more informed and constructive dialogue surrounding these critical issues.