The Pulling the Thread Podcast

Jesus the Jew within Judaism – Tracing Jesus Beyond Christianity – A Jewish Reclamation of Jesus!


Exploring the Impact of Platonic Philosophy on Paul’s Thought: Investigating the Intersection of Philosophy and Early Christianity

Paul, known for his exceptional education and knowledge, was profoundly influenced by the ideas of Plato, a renowned philosopher of ancient Greece. Through his writings, it becomes evident that Paul was familiar with Greek philosophy, including the works of Plato, which played a formative role in shaping his thinking. In numerous passages, Paul’s writings exhibit elements of Platonism, indicating his engagement with and exposure to these philosophical concepts.

One noteworthy example of Paul’s incorporation of Platonic ideas can be found in 1 Corinthians 15:38-44, where he draws a parallel between the transient nature of the physical body, metaphorically described as a “tent” that perishes at death, and the eternal aspect of the soul, which is likened to an everlasting “house.” This distinction between the physical and the spiritual realms aligns with a core principle of Platonism.

The concept of soul-body dualism, central to Plato’s philosophy, also emerges in Paul’s writings. Plato posited that the human soul is immortal and belongs to a higher realm of reality, while the body is perceived as a perishable prison for the soul. Paul echoes this view, frequently describing the conflict between the soul and the body. For instance, in Romans 7:14-25, he vividly portrays the struggle between his “sinful nature” (sarx) and his “inner being” (pneuma).

Additionally, both Plato and Paul embrace the idea of the logos. Plato regarded the logos as the rational principle that governs the universe. Paul, too, employs this concept and often refers to Jesus as the logos. In Colossians 1:15-20, Paul describes Jesus as “the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation,” aligning with the Platonic understanding of the logos as the organizing principle of reality.

The logos is a complex concept with a long history in Greek thought. In Plato’s philosophy, the logos is the divine reason that orders the universe. It is the blueprint for creation, and it is also the source of all knowledge and understanding. Paul’s use of the logos is similar to Plato’s, but it also has its own unique nuances. For Paul, the logos is not just a rational principle, but also a divine being. Jesus is the logos, and he is the one who brings order and meaning to the world.

The notion of redemption, prevalent in Platonism, also finds resonance in Paul’s writings. Plato proposed that the soul could be liberated from its entrapment within the body through philosophical contemplation. Paul incorporates a similar concept, frequently portraying salvation as a transformative process of being “renewed in the spirit of your minds” (Romans 12:2).

In Platonism, the soul is trapped in the body because it has become attached to material things. The goal of philosophical contemplation is to free the soul from these attachments so that it can return to its true home in the realm of the Forms. Paul’s understanding of redemption is similar, but it has a different emphasis. For Paul, the soul is not trapped in the body because of its attachments to material things, but because of sin. Sin is the ultimate source of the soul’s alienation from God.

In his correspondence with the Corinthians, Paul further delves into the differentiation between the “inner man” and the “outer man” (2 Corinthians 4:16). This differentiation reflects a concept similar to Plato’s distinction between the soul and the body. Plato considered the soul as the true essence of a person, while the body acted as a temporary confinement for the soul. Paul seems to convey a comparable idea when he discusses the renewal of the “inner man” in contrast to the decay experienced by the “outer man.”

Paul writes, “For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to do what is right, but I cannot carry it out. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing” (Romans 7:18-19). This passage suggests that Paul believed that the soul is constantly at war with the body, which is corrupted by sin.

Furthermore, Paul’s use of the term “resurrection” reflects a parallel to Plato’s teachings. Plato believed in the immortality of the soul and its eventual reunification with the body after death. Paul draws on this concept when discussing the resurrection of the dead. In 1 Corinthians 15:35, he asks, “How are the dead raised? With what kind of body do they come?” This question bears resemblance to one raised by Plato in his Phaedo.

While Paul creatively adapted Platonic ideas to fit his own theological framework, the influence of Platonism on his thought is undeniable. Specific passages in his writings, such as Romans 7:14-25, 1 Corinthians 15:35-54, Colossians 1:15-20, and others, have been identified by scholars as influenced by Plato. However, it is important to note that Paul presented novel interpretations and integrated these concepts into his unique perspective. He employed the Platonic distinction between the soul and the body to convey the relationship between Christians and Christ, emphasizing their unity and oneness (1 Corinthians 6:17).

It is important to note that Paul creatively adapted Platonic ideas to fit within his own theological framework. While he incorporated elements of Platonism, he also presented novel interpretations. For example, he used the Platonic distinction between the soul and the body to talk about the relationship between the Christian and Christ. He said that the Christian is “united with the Lord” and that “he who is joined to the Lord becomes one spirit with him” (1 Corinthians 6:17).

In conclusion, while Paul was not a strict adherent of Plato, his writings bear significant traces of Platonic philosophy. He adeptly incorporated and adapted these ideas to support his theological views, contributing to the development of his distinctive perspective within early Christianity.



Leave a comment

Podcast available on Spotify, Stitcher, Pandora, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music, Audible, TuneIn, iHeartRadio, Deezer, Radio Public, Cast Box, and many more…

About The Pulling the Thread Podcast

Pulling the Thread is a captivating podcast that delves into a plethora of thought-provoking topics. With its engaging episodes and insightful discussions, it offers a fresh perspective on various subjects, serving as a valuable source of inspiration and knowledge. Whether you’re a seasoned podcast enthusiast or a curious newcomer, Pulling the Thread guarantees to captivate your mind and keep you coming back for more. So, gear up and embark on an intellectual journey with this exceptional podcast!

The Pulling the Threads Podcast’s primary objective is to study and analyze Jesus within his Jewish context through the lens of Judaism before Christianity. Our primary objective is to study and analyze Jesus within his Jewish context, specifically from a pre-Christianity perspective. Seeking a Jewish Reclamation of Jesus, relying on Jewish and secular biblical scholars who specialize in Second Temple Judaism, the Qumran community, the Parting of Ways around 90 CE, the Historical Jesus, and Textual Criticism. Some notable scholars mentioned include Geza Vermes, Hyam Maccoby, Alan Segal, Carol Harris-Shapiro, Lawrence Kushner, Samuel Sandmel, Bart Ehrman, James Tabor, Robert Eisenman, Paula Frederiksen, and Hugh Schonfield.

The site aims to approach the New Testament using the historical-critical method and textual criticism within the realm of secular Jewish scholarship, reflecting the perspectives of mainstream Judaism today. Engaging in scholarly and polemical discussions, the group seeks to question and challenge established Christian doctrines. The main goal is to establish an independent Jewish understanding of Jesus, emphasizing his significance within a Jewish context and distancing him from centuries of Christian interpretations. Furthermore, the group aims to conduct a comprehensive historical examination of Jesus, employing textual criticism to counter Christianity’s claims regarding the New Testament. The focus is on understanding Jesus within Judaism based on the Torah and Talmud.

This is about Jewish and Secular Scholarship into the New Testament using the Historical Critical method and Textual Criticism within Jewish scholarship. For us Jews, the Tanakh and Talmud inform our view of scripture. In the modern age, as Jews, we struggle with texts with an academic approach. The site is pro-Tanakh and will explore history, archaeology, and textual criticism to comprehend the development of the Jesus movement before the parting of ways with Judaism. It aims to emphasize that Jesus and his followers were seen as Jewish and part of Judaism, and that the conversion of Gentiles to Judaism by the community of James and Peter continued, with some Jewish followers remaining distinctly Jewish for centuries. It is important to note that this is not a study of Jewish-Christians, but rather an examination of Jews who followed Jesus within Judaism before the emergence of Christianity. Anti-Judaism is not welcome in this group, which focuses on Jewish perspectives within an academic framework.

This is an attempt to work out the Jewish Reclamation of Jesus, trying to understand him within Judaism before Christianity existed. The group’s objective is to understand Jesus within Judaism before the influence of Christian perspectives during the historical Jesus movement. It seeks to reclaim Jesus within Judaism, separate from Christianity, Messianic, or Hebrew Roots movements. The study incorporates textual criticism, historical Jesus research, and Jewish scholarship into the New Testament to assert the following beliefs:

  • The New Testament lacks historical accuracy.
  • The New Testament is not divinely inspired.
  • The New Testament has not been divinely preserved.
  • The New Testament was written by individuals decades and even millennia after the events it portrays.
  • Original autographs of the New Testament do not exist.
  • Consequently, the New Testament is not the most reliable source for understanding the historical Jesus as a Jewish figure.
  • To ascertain historical accuracy, we rely on modern Jewish and secular scholarship and engage in historical reconstruction.
  • Through textual criticism, we strive to identify the potentially most authentic sayings of Jesus, following the Q hypothesis in relation to the synoptic gospels.
  • The New Testament bears the influence of Roman culture and language, making it a non-Jewish text with glimpses of Jewish source material.
  • Greco-Roman influences, including Hellenistic, Stoic, Gnostic, and paganistic elements (e.g., Zoroastrianism) and the Roman imperial cult, have shaped New Testament ideas of salvation and hell in a manner contrary to Jewish tradition, resulting in a narrative distinct from the Jewish religion.
  • Both Jewish and secular scholarship acknowledge approximately 500,000 textual errors among the 5,800 New Testament manuscripts. These variations include theological revisions that were added by later editors and were not believed by the original followers.
  • The seven most authentic epistles of Paul were written prior to the gospels, with the gospels reflecting the addition of Pauline theology.
  • Jesus might have been an actual person, with the only point of agreement among Jewish scholars being that he was baptized by John for the repentance of sins and was crucified.
  • Jewish scholars concur that Jesus was not born of a virgin, was not resurrected, is not a savior, may be considered a false prophet, and failed as the Messiah.
  • Judaism represents the religion of Jesus, while Christianity is a religion centered around Jesus.
  • The term “Jewish-Christian,” used to describe the early understanding of Jesus in Judaism, is a misnomer.

Understanding Jesus within Judaism can aid us in grappling with a culture in which Christianity has altered the Jewish message. Given the history of crusades, pogroms, the Holocaust, and inquisitions that have harmed the Jewish people, recognizing Jesus within a Jewish context becomes crucial.

The Catholic Church, in Nostra Aetate, ceased evangelizing Jews and acknowledged them as a covenant people within Judaism. In response, Jewish scholars released Dibre Emet, recognizing the place of Righteous Gentiles, including the offspring of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, in Olam HaBa (the world to come). While agreement may not be necessary, it is important to foster understanding and coexistence.

Newsletter