The Pulling the Thread Podcast

There are several views and theories regarding the identity of the Qumran community, the group associated with the production of the Dead Sea Scrolls. I am most inclined to believe that they were Essene’s related to the comments of Philo, Josephus and some other early attestation. Some of the various and most common views include the following:

1. Essene Theory: The Essene theory suggests that the Qumran community was an Essene sect. This view was popularized by scholars like Flavius Josephus and Philo of Alexandria. This view, which was first proposed in the 19th century, is based on the writings of the ancient Jewish historian Josephus, who described a group of Jews called the Essenes who lived in Palestine during the Second Temple period. According to this theory, the Essenes were a Jewish sect characterized by strict observance of ritual purity, communal living, and a focus on apocalyptic and Messianic expectations. The Essenes were a strict monastic order who lived in isolated communities and followed a strict code of conduct. Many of the practices and beliefs of the Qumran community, such as their communal living, their ritual baths, and their emphasis on purity, are similar to those described by Josephus.
2. Sadducee Theory: Some scholars propose that the Qumran community had connections to the Sadducees, one of the major Jewish sects of the time. This view, which was first proposed in the 20th century, is based on the fact that the Qumran community was located near the ruins of a Hasmonean fortress that was captured by the Romans in 63 BCE. This theory suggests that the community was composed of a dissident group within the Sadducees who emphasized purity and strict adherence to the Law. The Sadducees were a priestly aristocracy who were the ruling class of Judea during the Second Temple period. The Qumran community’s location near a Hasmonean fortress and their emphasis on priestly purity have led some scholars to suggest that the Qumran community may have been a group of Sadducees.
3. Pharisaic Theory: This view, which was first proposed in the 20th century, is based on the fact that the Qumran community’s beliefs and practices are similar to those of the Pharisees, another Jewish group that existed during the Second Temple period. The Pharisees were a lay movement that emphasized the importance of oral tradition and the study of the Torah. The Qumran community’s emphasis on the study of scripture and their belief in the resurrection of the dead are similar to the beliefs of the Pharisees.
4. Zadokite Theory: The Zadokite theory posits that the Qumran community had links to the Zadokite priesthood. It suggests that the community consisted of a group of priests who were disenchanted with the religious establishment and established their own community at Qumran.
5. Apocalyptic Movement Theory: This theory views the Qumran community as part of a wider apocalyptic movement that was prevalent during the Second Temple period. According to this view, the community was composed of individuals who expected the imminent arrival of the Messiah and participated in rigorous religious practices to prepare for the coming eschatological events.
6. Hasmonean Theory: The Hasmonean theory suggests that the Qumran community was associated with or influenced by the Hasmonean dynasty, the ruling family of Judea during the Maccabean period. This theory proposes that the community was either supportive of the Hasmoneans or opposed to their rule.
7. Jewish Mystics Theory: This view, which has been gaining popularity in recent years, is based on the fact that many of the Dead Sea Scrolls deal with eschatological (end-times) themes and mysticism. Some scholars have suggested that the Qumran community may have been a group of Jewish mystics who were interested in the study of the afterlife and the coming of the Messiah.

It is important to note that there is no scholarly consensus on the exact identity of the Qumran community, and these theories are subject to ongoing debate and revision. The available evidence from the Dead Sea Scrolls, archaeological findings, and historical sources presents a complex picture, and different scholars interpret the data in various ways, leading to multiple theories about the Qumran community’s identity. The evidence is inconclusive, and it is possible that the Qumran community was a group that combined elements of different Jewish groups. Only further research will shed more light on this mystery.`

---

Now there is another theory that is interesting and worth consideration. And I didn’t include it in the above list because this is a less common view and is a bit outside of the consensus. But I find it interesting.

---

Gabriele Boccaccini’s views on Enochian Judaism, the community at Qumran, and the Dead Sea Scrolls are informed by his extensive research and scholarship in the field. Here is a summary of some of his key perspectives:

1. Enochian Judaism: Boccaccini emphasizes the significance of Enochian Judaism as a distinct religious tradition within Second Temple Judaism. He argues that the Enochic literature, particularly the Book of Enoch, played a crucial role in shaping the beliefs and practices of various Jewish groups, including the community at Qumran. Boccaccini highlights the Enochic emphasis on angelology, apocalypticism, and the figure of the Son of Man as important components of Enochian Judaism.
2. Qumran Community: Boccaccini challenges the traditional view that the Qumran community was exclusively Essene. Instead, he proposes that the community had its roots in Enochic Judaism and developed its unique religious identity influenced by Enochic traditions. Boccaccini suggests that the Qumran community saw themselves as the spiritual heirs of Enoch and sought to embody the ideals and teachings found in the Enochic literature.
3. Sectarianism at Qumran: Boccaccini argues that the Qumran community should be understood as a sectarian group within Judaism, rather than a monolithic Essene community. He posits that the community’s strict adherence to ritual purity, communal living, and apocalyptic expectations set them apart from other Jewish groups of the time. Boccaccini explores the ideological and theological motivations behind the community’s sectarian practices and their perception of themselves as the faithful remnant within a corrupt religious establishment.
4. Dead Sea Scrolls: Boccaccini considers the Dead Sea Scrolls as a crucial source of information for understanding the beliefs, practices, and worldview of the Qumran community. He explores the diverse genres of texts found among the scrolls, including biblical commentaries, legal texts, apocalyptic writings, and sectarian literature. Boccaccini analyzes the connections between these texts and the broader Jewish literary and theological traditions, shedding light on the religious and intellectual milieu of the Second Temple period.

Through his research, Boccaccini offers a nuanced understanding of Enochian Judaism, the Qumran community, and the Dead Sea Scrolls. His views challenge conventional interpretations and provide valuable insights into the complex dynamics of Second Temple Judaism, highlighting the significance of the Enochic tradition and its influence on the community at Qumran. This is an interesting view this is not a view a subscribe to but it is quiet interesting take for sure. I want to summarize some of his work on the matter to give a glimpse of what he thinks.

---

His book “Beyond the Essene Hypothesis: The Parting of the Ways between Qumran and Enochic Judaism” is a book by Gabriele Boccaccini that challenges the prevailing theory that the Dead Sea Scrolls originated solely from the Essenes, a Jewish sect of the Second Temple period. Boccaccini argues that the Qumran community, which produced the scrolls, had a distinct identity rooted in Enochic Judaism, which was separate from both the Pharisees and the Sadducees after the Maccabean revolt.

Boccaccini begins by tracing the history of the Essene hypothesis, which was first proposed by the German scholar Eduard Reuss in 1866. Reuss argued that the Qumran community was a monastic order of Essenes, a group of Jews who lived in Palestine during the Second Temple period. This hypothesis was widely accepted by scholars for over a century, but it has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years.

The book explores the historical, literary, and theological evidence surrounding the Qumran community and its relationship to other Jewish groups of the time. Boccaccini proposes that the Qumran sect developed its unique religious identity based on the Enochic literature, particularly the Book of Enoch, which played a significant role in their religious beliefs and practices.

Boccaccini argues that there are a number of problems with the Essene hypothesis. First, there is no mention of the Essenes in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Second, the Essenes described by Josephus and Philo do not match the description of the Qumranites in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Third, the Qumranites were not a monastic order, as the Essenes were.

Boccaccini examines the texts found at Qumran, such as the Rule of the Community (the Manual of Discipline), the War Scroll, and the Hymns, and demonstrates their close affinity with the Enochic traditions. He argues that the Qumran community saw themselves as the true heirs of the Enochic priesthood and were engaged in a spiritual struggle against the prevailing religious establishment.

Boccaccini proposes an alternative hypothesis, which he calls the Enochian hypothesis. He argues that the Qumranites were a group of Enochian Jews, who were followers of the Book of Enoch. The Book of Enoch is an ancient Jewish text that tells the story of Enoch, a man who was taken up to heaven by God. The Book of Enoch was popular among Jews during the Second Temple period, and it is likely that the Qumranites were influenced by its teachings.

Boccaccini argues that the Qumranites separated from the mainstream Enochian movement after the Maccabean revolt. The Maccabean revolt was a civil war in Palestine that began in 167 BCE. The Maccabees were a group of Jews who rebelled against the Seleucid Empire, which had conquered Palestine. The Maccabees eventually won the war and established the Hasmonean dynasty.

The Maccabean revolt had a profound impact on Judaism. The Hasmoneans were not Zadokite priests, and they did not follow the traditional Jewish law. This led to a split in Judaism, with the Qumranites and other Enochian Jews forming their own movement.

Furthermore, Boccaccini suggests that the Qumran community’s emphasis on purity, communal living, and apocalyptic expectations align closely with the Enochic worldview. He asserts that the Essene hypothesis fails to capture the distinctiveness of the Qumran community and the Enochic influence on their beliefs and practices.

By challenging the Essene hypothesis and highlighting the significance of Enochic Judaism, Boccaccini offers a new perspective on the origins and nature of the Dead Sea Scrolls. His work contributes to a deeper understanding of the diverse religious landscape of the Second Temple period and sheds light on the complexities of Jewish thought and sects during that time.

Boccaccini’s book has been praised by scholars for its originality and its insights into the Qumran community. It has also been criticized by some scholars for its lack of evidence. However, Boccaccini’s book has sparked a new debate about the identity of the Qumran community, and it is likely to be a major contribution to Qumran studies for many years to come.

---

Another book from Boccaccini that shows his take is the book Enoch and the Messiah Son of Man: Revisiting the Book of Parables is a collection of essays edited by Gabriele Boccaccini. The essays explore the relationship between the Book of Parables, a significant text among the Dead Sea Scrolls, a section of the Ethiopic Book of Enoch, and the development of the concept of the Messiah Son of Man in Second Temple Judaism.

The Book of Parables is a relatively late section of the Ethiopic Book of Enoch, dating from the first century BCE or CE. It tells the story of Enoch’s ascension to heaven, where he sees visions of the future, including the coming of the Messiah Son of Man. Boccaccini focuses on the figure of Enoch, an important figure in Jewish apocalyptic literature, and the Messianic figure known as the Son of Man. He examines how the Book of Parables presents the Son of Man as a central figure in the eschatological drama, emphasizing his role as the righteous judge and the agent of divine salvation.

The essays in Enoch and the Messiah Son of Man argue that the Book of Parables played an important role in the development of the concept of the Messiah Son of Man. They show that the figure of the Messiah Son of Man in the Book of Parables is closely related to the figure of Enoch, and that the Book of Parables helped to popularize the idea of a heavenly redeemer who would come to save Israel.

The book delves into the origins and development of the Son of Man concept, tracing its roots in the Enochic literature and its influence on Jewish and early Christian thought. Boccaccini explores how the Book of Parables reshapes the traditional Messianic expectations by presenting the Son of Man as a preexistent, celestial figure with divine attributes.

The essays also explore the relationship between the Book of Parables and the New Testament. They show that the New Testament authors were familiar with the Book of Parables, and that they drew on its imagery and ideas in their own writings. For example, the New Testament authors’ description of Jesus as the Messiah Son of Man is likely influenced by the description of the Messiah Son of Man in the Book of Parables.

Boccaccini analyzes the themes, imagery, and theological implications of the Book of Parables, highlighting its connections to other Jewish texts and its impact on early Christian interpretations of Jesus as the Son of Man. He discusses the relationship between the Book of Parables and the Gospels, particularly the Gospel of Mark, where the Son of Man title is prominently used to describe Jesus.

Enoch and the Messiah Son of Man is an important contribution to the study of the Ethiopic Book of Enoch, the development of the concept of the Messiah Son of Man, and the relationship between the Ethiopic Book of Enoch and the New Testament.

Through his analysis, Boccaccini challenges previous scholarly interpretations of the Book of Parables and offers new insights into its significance for understanding the Messianic expectations of the time. He argues that the Book of Parables reflects a distinct strand of Messianic thought influenced by the Enochic tradition, which had a significant impact on early Jewish and Christian eschatology.

Here are some of the key arguments made in the essays:

• The Book of Parables is a product of the Enochic movement, a Jewish movement that flourished during the Second Temple period.
• The Book of Parables was written in response to the Maccabean revolt, which led to a crisis of faith among many Jews.
• The Book of Parables offers a new understanding of the Messiah, who is not a human king but a heavenly redeemer who will come to save Israel.
• The Book of Parables was an important influence on the New Testament authors, who drew on its imagery and ideas in their own writings.

In summary, “Enoch and the Messiah Son of Man: Revisiting the Book of Parables” explores the figure of the Son of Man in the Book of Parables, connecting it to the Enochic tradition and examining its implications for understanding early Messianic beliefs. The book sheds light on the complex interplay between Jewish and early Christian ideas about the Messiah and offers fresh perspectives on the Son of Man concept and its of significance.

---

The last book from Boccaccini that I want to summarize for your understanding is “Enoch and Qumran Origins” is a book by Gabriele Boccaccini that investigates the origins and significance of the Enochic literature, particularly the Book of Enoch, in relation to the Qumran community and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Boccaccini challenges the traditional view that the Qumran community was an Essene sect, and he argues that the Enochian hypothesis is a better explanation for the evidence.

Boccaccini begins by tracing the history of the Essene hypothesis, which was first proposed by the German scholar Eduard Reuss in 1866. Reuss argued that the Qumran community was a monastic order of Essenes, a group of Jews who lived in Palestine during the Second Temple period. This hypothesis was widely accepted by scholars for over a century, but it has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years.

Boccaccini explores the historical and cultural context of the Second Temple period, seeking to understand the development of the Enochic traditions and their connection to the Qumran community. He examines the Enochic texts found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, such as the Book of Enoch, the Astronomical Book, and the Book of Giants, to uncover their theological, ideological, and literary connections.

Boccaccini argues that there are a number of problems with the Essene hypothesis. First, there is no mention of the Essenes in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Second, the Essenes described by Josephus and Philo do not match the description of the Qumranites in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Third, the Qumranites were not a monastic order, as the Essenes were.

The book discusses the role of Enoch as a legendary figure and the influence of his writings on Jewish thought. Boccaccini argues that the Qumran community saw themselves as the spiritual heirs of Enoch and sought to embody the ideals and teachings found in the Enochic literature.

Boccaccini proposes an alternative hypothesis, which he calls the Enochian hypothesis. He argues that the Qumranites were a group of Enochian Jews, who were followers of the Book of Enoch. The Book of Enoch is an ancient Jewish text that tells the story of Enoch, a man who was taken up to heaven by God. The Book of Enoch was popular among Jews during the Second Temple period, and it is likely that the Qumranites were influenced by its teachings.

Boccaccini delves into the themes present in the Enochic texts, such as apocalypticism, angelology, and the figure of the Son of Man. He explores the impact of these ideas on the religious beliefs and practices of the Qumran community, shedding light on their worldview and their understanding of their own role in the cosmic drama.

Boccaccini argues that the Qumranites were a group of Enochians who separated from the mainstream Enochian movement after the Maccabean revolt. The Maccabean revolt was a civil war in Palestine that began in 167 BCE. The Maccabees were a group of Jews who rebelled against the Seleucid Empire, which had conquered Palestine. The Maccabees eventually won the war and established the Hasmonean dynasty.

Furthermore, Boccaccini examines the Enochic traditions in light of other Jewish groups and movements of the time, such as the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes. He discusses the potential influences and interactions between these groups, offering insights into the diverse religious landscape of Second Temple Judaism.

The Maccabean revolt had a profound impact on Judaism. The Hasmoneans were not Zadokite priests, and they did not follow the traditional Jewish law. This led to a split in Judaism, with the Qumranites and other Enochian Jews forming their own movement.

Through his analysis, Boccaccini presents a compelling argument for the significance of the Enochic literature in shaping the beliefs and identity of the Qumran community. He highlights the unique contributions of the Enochic texts to our understanding of Second Temple Judaism and their relevance to the interpretation of the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Here are some of the key arguments made in the book:

• The Qumran community was a group of Enochians, not Essenes.
• The Book of Enoch was an important source of inspiration for the Qumran community.
• The Qumran community’s beliefs and practices were shaped by their understanding of the Book of Enoch.
• The Qumran community’s separation from the mainstream Jewish community was due to their belief that the Maccabean revolt was a sign of the end times.
• The Qumran community’s hope for the future was based on their belief that the Messiah would come to defeat the forces of evil and establish a new world order.

In summary, “Enoch and Qumran Origins” explores the origins, influences, and theological implications of the Enochic literature in relation to the Qumran community and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Boccaccini’s research provides valuable insights into the role of Enochic traditions in the development of Jewish thought and the religious milieu of the Second Temple period. Boccaccini’s book has been praised by scholars for its originality and its insights into the Qumran community. It has also been criticized by some scholars for its lack of evidence. However, Boccaccini’s book has sparked a new debate about the identity of the Qumran community, and it is likely to be a major contribution to Qumran studies for many years to come.

---

At the end of the day I would say this is an interesting theory that I myself do not subscribe to but I find his research to be intriguing.